A Prospective Randomized Pilot Trial of Cryoablation (CA) Versus Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA) for the Management of Small Renal Masses
By enrolling all patients treated with CA or RFA, this study will document for the first
time the safety and the short and long term efficacy of CA compared to RFA as well as
provide urologists and decision makers currently unavailable information on CA in Canada.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Treatment failure rate.
Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48
No
Anil Kapoor, MD
Principal Investigator
McMaster Institute of Urology, McMaster University
Canada: Ethics Review Committee
IIS-001-09
NCT00922948
March 2010
October 2014
Name | Location |
---|