Genetic Counseling for Breast Cancer Susceptibility in African American Women
Five to 10% of all breast cancer cases have been attributed to two breast ovarian cancer
susceptibility genes called BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2). Genetic counseling and testing for
BRCA1/2 mutations is now available through clinical research programs using standard
counseling protocols. The goal of pre test counseling is to facilitate informed decision
making about whether to be tested and to prepare participants for possible outcomes. The
goal of post test counseling is to provide information about risk status, recommendations
for surveillance, and options for prevention. However, previous research suggests that
African American and Caucasian women differ in their attitudes about and responses to pre
test education and counseling. Increasingly, cultural beliefs and values are being
recognized as important factors in genetic counseling. Despite recommendations to increase
the cultural sensitivity of breast cancer risk counseling, such programs have not been
developed or evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop a Culturally
Tailored Genetic Counseling (CTGC) protocol for African American women and evaluate its
impact on psychological functioning and health behaviors compared with Standard Genetic
Counseling (SGC) in a randomized clinical trial.
1. To evaluate the relative impact of CTGC vs. SGC on decision making and satisfaction
about BRCA1/2 testing. Compared to SGC, CTGC will lead to higher rates of test
acceptance and satisfaction with testing decisions. These effects will be mediated by
increases in perceived benefits and decreases in perceived limitations and risks of
genetic testing.
2. To evaluate the impact of CTGC vs. SGC on quality of life and health behaviors
following BRCA1/2 testing. Compared to SGC, CTGC will lead to larger decreases in
general and cancer specific distress, greater increases in adherence to cancer
screening guidelines, and lower rates of prophylactic surgery. Reductions in
psychological distress will be mediated by increased use of spiritual coping
strategies.
Secondary Aim
To identify African American women who are most and least likely to benefit from CTGC vs.
SGC. We predict that the relative benefits of CTGC will be greatest for women with greater
endorsement of African American cultural values and those identified as BRCA1/2 carriers.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Educational/Counseling/Training
Psychological functioning
Chanita Hughes-Halbert, Ph.D.
Principal Investigator
University of Pennsylvania
United States: Institutional Review Board
704355
NCT00419510
February 2003
August 2007
Name | Location |
---|---|
University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 |