Comparison of Ara-c 12 gm/m2 vs 18 gm/m2 Per Cycle for 3 Cycles Each as Consolidation in AML ; An Open Label Randomized Non-inferiority Study
Objectives
- To compare the efficacy of two different doses of Cytarabine during consolidation
therapy for newly diagnosed patients of Non APML - Acute Myeloid Leukemia who are in CR
post induction
- To compare the toxicity of the two different Cytarabine doses
Primary end point
- Relapse free survival at 1 yr from randomization
- Relapse will be defined as >5 % leukemic blasts in the marrow aspirate or new
extramedullary disease anytime after randomization
Secondary end points
- Overall survival
- Median time to relapse
- Toxicity- Haematological and Non -Haematological
Inclusion criteria
- Confirmation of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by morphologic, immunophenotypic analysis
- Suitable for HIDAC as consolidation
- AML with underlying MDS will be included
Exclusion criteria
- Previous AML chemotherapy [Hydroxyurea - not an exclusion.]
- CML-BC
- Concurrent active malignancy
- HIV infection, Uncontrolled Hepatitis B/C
- Patients being considered for upfront PBSCT (before completion of CONSOLIDATION)
- Serum Bilirubin > 2
- APML
- Delayed recovery of blood counts /persistent active infection > 45 days from start of
induction
- Patients receiving reinduction with HIDAC
- Therapy related AML Methodology
- The period of enrollment will be from July 1, 2012 to September 30 ,2013
- Baseline information will be recorded in a preformulated proforma designed for analysis
at a later date
Treatment
- Standard 3 + 7 INDUCTION with Daunomycin and Cytarabine with DNR at 60- 90 mg/m2 as per
the PS and comorbidities/active infections at presentation
- Bone marrow examination - D+ 28 of induction or earlier if needed . Patients not in
CR - reinduction regimen as per discretion of treating physician
- Patients in complete morphological remission ( after 1 or 2 inductions) : will receive
consolidation with HIDAC and will be randomized into the two study arms after written
Informed Consent: Arm A and B with 90 patients in each arm Arm A will receive HIDAC at
18 gm/m2/cycle for 3 cycles , i.e. 3 gm/m2 BD , Day 1,3,5 Arm B will receive HIDAC at
12 gm/m2/cycle for 3 cycles , i.e. 2 gm/m2 BD , Day 1,3,5
sample size
- Assuming a RFS of 60 % at 1 yr in each arm and keeping a non-inferiority margin of 20
% , Alpha at 5 % ,75 patients are required in each arm on the basis of statistical
calculation.
- 15 patients added in each arm to account for losses
- Total required in each arm = 90
- ANC> 1000 , Platelet count > 1 lac required to start HIDAC
- Detailed information of the course of all the chemotherapy cycles will be recorded
including-
1. toxicity
2. details of antimicrobials
3. supportive care ( including transfusions)
4. Use of growth factors
- Cytogenetic analysis using standard technique of chromosomal banding
- Molecular analysis for mutation of FLT3-ITD will be performed
- Risk stratification will be done as per guidelines
- Patients in both arms will be kept under close follow up and will be assessed with
blood counts /PS , 2 monthly / or earlier as clinically indicated
Statistical Analysis
- Qualitative data will be analyzed using the Chi-square test
- Quantitative data will be compared by using t-test /Mann Whitney test
- Besides this survival analysis will be carried out.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Relapse free survival at 1 yr of follow up
1 year
No
Prashant Mehta, MD
Principal Investigator
AIIMS, Delhi, India
India: Indian Council of Medical Research
AML HIDAC, AIIMS
NCT01615757
August 2012
September 2014
Name | Location |
---|