A Multicentre, Randomized, Open Label, Phase III Study of Gemcitabine Versus FOLFOX in the First Line Setting for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Using Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 (hENT1) Biomarker Testing.
Pre-clinical and retrospective clinical data indicates hENT1 may be a predictive and
prognostic biomarker for gemcitabine (Gem) efficacy. To ultimately prove its use as a
biomarker, a prospective randomized study with hENT1 stratification is required. This study
would provide the highest level of confidence, and would, if positive, vault Gem into the
select few anticancer agents for which a truly sensitive population can be rationally
treated. By this "molecular triage", the risk/benefit ratio of Gem therapy for pancreas
cancer (PC) could be meaningfully improved while also providing rationale for the use of a
different treatment regimen should tumours have low hENT1. The comparator arm of FOLFOX was
chosen because of the recent data showing impressive patient outcomes with the use of
oxaliplatin-based treatments.
This is a randomized, open-label, multicentre, phase III trial in which eligible patients
with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma will be randomized between Gem and FOLFOX with
predefined upfront testing for hENT1. To be eligible, patients will have to have adequate
tissue available for hENT1 testing which the Cross Cancer Institute (CCI) will ensure prior
to treatment randomization. Patients will have their tumour sample tested for the
expression of hENT1. A blinded pathologist with expertise knowledge and experience with
hENT1 staining at the lead centre (CCI) will be responsible for pathologic hENT1
classification via IHC. hENT1 IHC will be determined and scored as previously outlined.(1)
Once hENT1 status has been confirmed, patients will then be randomized 1:1 between Gem and
FOLFOX. Patients will be treated on study until disease progression, overwhelming toxicity,
or patient withdrawal of consent. Dose adjustments for one or more of the study drugs will
be based on toxicities encountered by individual patients. Specific dose-adjustment and
treatment guidelines for hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities including neutropenia,
diarrhea, renal toxicity, and neurotoxicity will be outlined in the protocol. Prior to
enrolment, screening procedures will document compliance with inclusion and exclusion
criteria. The primary endpoint will be determination of the difference in PFS in the two
study arms, defined from the study start date until either an increase in the sum of the
products of the diameters of measurable lesions by ≥ 20% bases on revised RECIST guidelines
version 1.1 (2), the appearance of any new lesion, or a deterioration in clinical status
that is consistent with disease progression. Secondary endpoints will be determination of
the differences in overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall
survival (OS). Administered dose intensity of Gem and FOLFOX will be reported.
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) will be assessed for the duration of active treatment
on study.
Patient Population: The target population is patients with measurable metastatic
adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have not been previously treated with systemic therapy
for their metastatic disease and who have tumour samples amenable to hENT1 testing. Fine
needle aspiration biopsies will not be permitted. Patients who have received prior
chemotherapy delivered as part of initial curative therapy (i.e. neoadjuvant, adjuvant,
and/or concurrently delivered with radiation and/or surgery) are permitted as long as that
treatment was completed at least 6 months prior to study start date. Patients may have
received prior radiotherapy or surgery ≥ 4 weeks before study entry and must have recovered
from the toxic effects from any prior therapy. Patients with locally advanced
adenocarcinoma of the pancreas will be excluded. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria are
detailed in the protocol.
Study Objectives:
Primary Objective: To determine the difference PFS between Gem and FOLFOX treated patients
in hENT1 high and hENT1 low pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Secondary Objectives: 1) To determine the difference in ORR between the two treatment arms;
2) To determine the rate of disease control, defined as the sum of complete response rate,
partial response rate, and stable disease between the two treatment arms; 3) To determine
the difference in OS between the two treatment arms; 4) To determine the differences in HRQL
of patients on the two treatment arms.
Exploratory Objectives: 1) To investigate the role of hCNT3 and its interaction with
hENT1-related patient outcomes. 2) To evaluate excision repair cross complementing 1 (ERCC1)
and microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumour samples, both of which are increasingly being
linked to efficacy in oxaliplatin-based therapy but for which information in PC is lacking.
Duration of Treatment: Treatment will continue until objective or symptomatic disease
progression, overwhelming toxicity, or patient withdrawal of consent. A patient may
continue to receive all or any combination of study drugs for as long as the investigator
feels is appropriate, but will be discontinued from study in case of:
1) Clinical and/or radiological documented disease progression (as determined by revised
RECIST 1.1 criteria).(2) All drugs will be discontinued and the patient removed from study;
2) Occurrence of unacceptable toxicity (this may be due to one or more drugs resulting in
one or more study drug discontinuation); if all three drugs are discontinued the patient
will be removed from study; 3) Failure to recover from hematologic and/or non-hematologic
toxicity to re-treatment level despite dosing interruption of up to 28 days (this may be due
to one or more study drugs resulting in one or more study drug discontinuation); if all
drugs in regimen are discontinued the patient will be removed from study; 4) Patient's
request (withdrawal of consent) or Investigator's recommendation (this may be one or more
study drugs); if all three study drugs are discontinued patient will be removed from study;
5) Patient death (complete Serious Adverse Event Report for deaths occurring within 30 days
after last study drug dose OR for deaths occurring after 30 days, only if considered related
to study drug).
Efficacy Endpoints: Response assessments will be performed every 8 weeks, regardless of
treatment cycle. History, physical exam, laboratory work, imaging, ECOG performance status
(PS), will be required at each response assessment. PS will be measured using the ECOG
performance status scale. Tumor marker (CA19-9) may be followed at the discretion of the
investigator but should not be used in determination of disease response and are not a
requirement of the study. Tumor response will be evaluated according to the revised RECIST
criteria 1.1.(2) Symptomatic progression will be defined as new or worsening disease
symptoms deemed by the treating oncologist to incompatible with continuation of study
medication or the requirement for palliative radiation therapy or a fall in ECOG performance
status to ≥ 3 deemed to be due to disease and not study treatment. Should symptomatic
progression occur, imaging to confirm progression is advised but if not possible due to
performance status, the study stop date will be recorded as the date of progression.
Safety: The NCI CTCAE (version 4.0) will be used to evaluate the clinical safety of the
treatment in this study. Subjects will be assessed for adverse events at each clinical
visit and as necessary throughout the study. Safety will be assessed via vital signs,
physical exams, laboratory tests (including hematologic, serum chemistry, and liver function
testing), and adverse event determination. Pregnant and nursing females will be excluded
from participation in the trial.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
The difference Progression Free Survival (PFS) between Gemcitabine and FOLFOX treated patients in hENT1 high and hENT1 low pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Progression free survival will be measured from the date of diagnosis to the date of progression or death, patients who did not progress or is alive at the last date of follow-up will be censored for the analysis. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival function and log-rank test will be utilized to compare the study arms. The median PFS and the corresponding 95% confidence interval will be used for reporting purpose. The hazard ratio and the corresponding 95% two-sided confidence interval using Cox-proportional hazard regression will be presented.
2 Years
No
Jennifer L Spratlin, MD FRCPC
Study Chair
Oncologist, Cross Cancer Institute
Canada: Health Canada
Panc001
NCT01586611
June 2012
June 2015
Name | Location |
---|