Know Cancer

or
forgot password

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Drug-eluting Beads Administered by Hepatic Chemoembolization With Intravenous Cetuximab (DEBIRITUX) Versus Systemic Treatment With Intravenous Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and K-ras Wild-type Tumours


Phase 2
18 Years
N/A
Not Enrolling
Both
Colorectal Cancer

Thank you

Trial Information

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Drug-eluting Beads Administered by Hepatic Chemoembolization With Intravenous Cetuximab (DEBIRITUX) Versus Systemic Treatment With Intravenous Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and K-ras Wild-type Tumours


About half of patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer will develop metastatic
disease and, however, in spite of the significant progress in the therapeutical strategies
for metastatic disease, virtually all patients will eventually succumb to their illness.
Based on prior clinical data there is a good rationale for the expectation that the
combination of systemic chemotherapy and arterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads
may be effective in the setting of patients with unresectable or chemorefractory liver
metastases. The aim of this study is therefore to assess whether the combination of
Irinotecan eluting beads and intravenous cetuximab is safe and effective in the treatment of
patients with unresectable liver metastases from refractory colorectal cancer and will
result in a prolongation of disease control when compared to standard systemic treatment
with intravenous irinotecan and intravenous cetuximab. In this patient group, intravenous
irinotecan plus intravenous cetuximab may represent the "standard of care", with a
previously described activity. The patient group is defined in terms of pretreatment, and
the scientific question is whether the way of irinotecan administration by eluting beads in
feasible and somehow beneficial.


Inclusion Criteria:



1. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of stage IV (UICC) colorectal cancer with
unresectable liver metastases (primary tumour may be present) and k-ras wild-type
tumours

2. Patients had been treated and shown to be refractory to 5-FU (Capecitabine
allowed)/oxaliplatin and/or 5-FU/irinotecan. Prior therapy with VEGF-inhibitors (e.g
bevacizumab) is allowed

3. Patients with at least one measurable liver metastasis, with size > 1cm (RECIST
criteria)

4. Patients with liver only or liver dominant disease (defined as ≥ 50 % tumour burden
confined to the liver)

5. Patients with a portal vein not interfering with transarterial chemoembolization
(e.g. no thrombosis) as judged by the investigator

6. ECOG Performance status ≤ 2

7. Life expectancy > 3 months

8. Age ≥ 18 years.

9. At least 4 weeks since last administration of last chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
(bone metastases may be allowed)

10. Patients who received VEGF-inhibition (e.g. with bevacizumab) in prior therapy are
eligible if stopped since 4-6 weeks before randomization

11. Haematologic function: ANC ≥ 1.5 x 109/L, platelets ≥ 75 x109/L

12. INR < 1.5 (patients on therapeutic anticoagulants are not eligible)

13. Adequate liver function as measured by serum transaminases (AST & ALT) ≤ 3 x ULN and
total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN

14. Adequate renal function: Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN

15. Normal level of serum magnesium

16. Women of child bearing potential and fertile men are required to use effective
contraception (negative serum βHCG for women of child-bearing age

17. Signed, written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Presence of CNS metastases

2. Contraindications to irinotecan therapy (Chronic inflammatory bowel disease and/or
bowel obstruction, history of severe hypersensitivity reactions to irinotecan
hydrochloride trihydrate)

3. Active bacterial, viral or fungal infection within 72 hours of study entry

4. Women who are pregnant or breast feeding

5. Allergy to contrast media

6. Presence of another concurrent malignancy. Prior malignancy in the last 5 years
except adequately treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of
the cervix

7. Any contraindication for hepatic embolisation procedures:

- Large shunt as determined by the investigator (pretesting with lung perfusion
scan not required)

- Severe atheromatosis

- Hepatofugal blood flow

8. Other significant medical or surgical condition, or any medication or treatment, that
would place the patient at undue risk, that would preclude the safe use of
chemoembolization or would interfere with study participation

9. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the drugs used in the trial (eg:
cetuximab, 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, or any component of aprepitant)

Type of Study:

Interventional

Study Design:

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Outcome Measure:

Progression free survival rate

Outcome Time Frame:

6 months after first administration of study medication

Safety Issue:

No

Principal Investigator

Dirk Arnold, MD

Investigator Role:

Principal Investigator

Investigator Affiliation:

Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Universitäres Cancer Center

Authority:

Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices

Study ID:

EudraCT: 2009-014728-44

NCT ID:

NCT01060423

Start Date:

February 2010

Completion Date:

September 2013

Related Keywords:

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • colorectal
  • liver metastasis
  • KRAS wildtype
  • chemoembolization
  • irinotecan eluting beads
  • Colorectal Neoplasms

Name

Location