A Randomised Trial of Radical Chemo/Radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy Alone in the Definitive Management of Localised Muscle Invasive TCC of the Urinary Bladder
Whilst concurrent chemo-radiation is increasingly being looked upon as the treatment of
choice for patients referred for bladder preservation, the study by the NCI of Canada
(Coppin CM, Gospodarowicz MK et al.Improved Local Control of Invasive Bladder Cancer by
Concurrent Cisplatin and Pre-operative or Definitive Radiation.J. of Clinical Oncol. 14(11):
2901-2907, 1996) is the only randomised trial to show some superiority of concurrent
Cisplatin and radiation treatment over radiation alone in increasing pelvic tumour control.
There was no impact on overall survival. However, this study had relatively small subject
numbers and included two distinct treatment options. In one group the patients were treated
with a bladder sparing approach and in the other by pre-operative therapy and cystectomy
with the type of definitive treatment being decided upon by both the treating Specialist and
patient. At 5 years the pelvic failure rates in the radiation alone and chemo-radiation arms
were 59% and 40% respectively. With half of the patients in each group having had planned
cystectomy as part of their treatment regimen, the above rates of local relapse (especially
in the chemo-radiation arm) are disappointing.
Given the concerns with the above study, and the continuing paucity of randomised phase III
studies comparing chemo-radiation with radiation alone, there lies an opportunity for
Australasian centres to take up the challenge. For this study, the proposed schedule for the
chemo-radiation arm is to be the same as that being investigated in our previous phase II
study (six weekly doses of Cisplatin plus radiation to a dose of 64Gy in 32 fractions over
6.5 weeks). This will be compared with radical radiation alone (64Gy in 32 fractions over
6.5 weeks).
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Invasive local failure at 3 years
3 years
No
Kumar Gogna
Study Chair
Mater Centre - South Brisbane
Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration
TROG 02.03
NCT00330499
October 2002
November 2010
Name | Location |
---|