Know Cancer

or
forgot password

Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of MMF, Daclizumab and Corticosteroids as Mainstay Immunosuppression in Combination With Low-Dose CsA, Tac or Sir in Comparison to Current Standard Immunosuppression (MMF, CsA and Corticosteroids) in Renal Tx


Phase 4
18 Years
75 Years
Not Enrolling
Both
Kidney Transplantation

Thank you

Trial Information

Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of MMF, Daclizumab and Corticosteroids as Mainstay Immunosuppression in Combination With Low-Dose CsA, Tac or Sir in Comparison to Current Standard Immunosuppression (MMF, CsA and Corticosteroids) in Renal Tx


The purpose of the SYMPHONY study is to compare four different immunosuppressive regimens.
They are each given for one year. The following four combinations are tested in four groups
of patients:

- Group A: Cyclosporine in a normal dosage, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and
corticosteroids

- Group B: Daclizumab in the first two months after transplantation, cyclosporine in a
lower dosage compared to group A, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids

- Group C: Daclizumab in the first two months after transplantation, tacrolimus in low
dosage, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids

- Group D: Daclizumab in the first two months after transplantation, sirolimus in a low
dosage, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids.

All drugs of the four immunosuppressive regimes are approved by the Health Authorities in
the participating country for use in kidney transplantation. The regimen administered to the
patients in Group A represents a standard treatment, currently given with success to many
transplant patients in a number of countries in the world. The treatments in Groups B, C and
D are experimental in the sense that either the doses administered are lower than the ones
used before and/or the combination of drugs is experimental. Nevertheless, there are results
of scientific studies indicating that they are all effective alternatives and that they
might have advantages compared to the standard immunosuppressive regimen, in particular as
far as their safety (side effects, long-term toxicity) is concerned. However, from the
previous clinical experience, it is not yet clear which regimen offers the most advantages
for the patients. To find this out, in SYMPHONY the four regimens are administered to the
four groups of patients (A-D) and the results in the different groups will be compared.


Inclusion Criteria:



- Male or female patients between 18 - 75 years

- Recipients of single-organ renal primary allograft or second renal transplants
(provided that the previous graft was not lost from acute rejection within the first
year) from living or cadaver donors

- Patients who provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- PRA > 20% within 6 months prior to enrollment

- Cold ischemia time > 30 hours

- Previous treatment with daclizumab

- History of malignancy (except localized skin cancer)

- Active peptic ulcer disease.

Type of Study:

Interventional

Study Design:

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label

Outcome Measure:

GFR calculated from the serum creatinine with the Cockcroft-Gault formula at 12 months posttransplantation

Principal Investigator

Henrik Ekberg, Prof.

Investigator Role:

Study Chair

Investigator Affiliation:

Malmo University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

Authority:

Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration

Study ID:

SYMPHONY

NCT ID:

NCT00231764

Start Date:

November 2002

Completion Date:

February 2008

Related Keywords:

  • Kidney Transplantation
  • Renal transplantation
  • Immunosuppression
  • Daclizumab
  • GFR

Name

Location