Randomized Trial Comparing Robotic and Abdominal Surgery for High Risk Endometrial Cancer
Hypothesis: Robotic assisted laparoscopy (RAL)is equal in terms of oncologic and surgical
safety as conventional abdominal surgery (AS) for high risk endometrial cancer (EC).
Methods: Women with high risk EC (defined as high grade endometrial, clear cell or serous)
are randomized to either RAL or AS. Both groups will undergo complete surgical staging
(hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy, pelvic and paraaortal lymphadenectomy)
Primary endpoint: Number of harvested lymph nodes per station Secondary endpoints:
Recurrences up to 3 year after surgery. Lymphatic side-effects, quality of life, cost,
surgical morbidity.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Number of harvested lymph nodes
Extracted lymphatic tissue from 3 stations (above inferior mesenteric artery, below inferior mesenteric artery, pelvic) is analysed by a pathologist and the number of nodes for each station recorded and compared between the two groups
1 year
Yes
Henrik Falconer, MD, PhD
Principal Investigator
Karolinska Institutet
Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board
2013/361-31/1
NCT01847703
April 2013
April 2018
Name | Location |
---|