Know Cancer

forgot password

An Attempt at Validation of the Seventh Edition of the Classification by the International Union Against Cancer for Esophageal Carcinoma

18 Years
Not Enrolling
Esophageal Cancer

Thank you

Trial Information

An Attempt at Validation of the Seventh Edition of the Classification by the International Union Against Cancer for Esophageal Carcinoma


The University-Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf is a specialist reference centre for the treatment
of patients with esophageal carcinoma in Germany. A prospective database for all patients
with surgically resectable esophageal carcinoma was established in 1992 at the Department
for General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Germany. Only patients without perioperative chemotherapy and histologically proven
esophageal cancer were included into this study. The demographic, clinical, operative and
postoperative courses of each patient were collected. Informed consent was obtained from all
patients before including them in the prospective database. The study was approved by the
Medical Ethical Committee of the chamber of physicians of Hamburg.

Surgical procedures in patients with esophageal carcinomas encompassed either transhiatal
(TH) or thoracoabdominal (TA) esophagectomy. The thoraco-abdominal (Ivor - Lewis)
esophagectomies were performed by right-sided thoracotomy, median inverse T-shaped
laparotomy, and left-sided cervicotomy for collar anastomosis until mid 2003. From mid 2003
onward the anastomosis was done highly intrathoracically. A wide peritumoral resection was
performed including an en bloc subtotal esophageal resection with dissection of the
right-sided paratracheal, aortopulmonary window, subcarinal, mediastinal, and paracardial
lymph nodes. The azygos vein was also resected. An extensive lymphadenectomy of the upper
abdominal compartment (D-II lymphadenectomy, including the paracardial nodes, the left
gastric artery nodes along with the lymph nodes of the lesser curvature of the stomach, the
celiac trunk, the common hepatic artery, and the splenic artery) was conducted.

The transhiatal esophagectomies consisted of an inversed T-shaped laparotomy, followed by
wide peritumoral dissection of the distal esophagus and abdominal lymph node dissection of
the upper abdominal compartment (D-II lymphadenectomy), and a dissection of the lymph nodes
of the posterior mediastinum extending as far as the main carina of the trachea. Above the
tracheal bifurcation, the dissection was continued bluntly using digital dissection and
staying close to the esophageal wall.


Postoperative follow-up was conducted in all patients at three months intervals for the
first two years and at six-month intervals thereafter, and included physical examination,
plain chest radiography, abdominal ultrasonography, endoscopy, endosonography, computed
tomography of the chest and abdomen as well as PET-CT after January 2006 in selected cases,
studies of tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9), and bone scanning.
Recurrence was diagnosed if proven by biopsy or unequivocal evidence of tumor masses (newly
appearing metastases or local recurrence) with a tendency to grow during further follow-up
and/or follow-up until death. Events considered were death, local recurrence, and distant
metastasis. When no events were recorded, the patients were censored at the last contact.
The last general follow-up of survivors was done at the end of April 2011. Overall patient
survival, defined as time from operation to death or last follow-up, was used as a measure
of prognosis.

Statistical Analysis

We used the SPSS 17.0 for Windows for statistical analysis. Tumor stage and grade were
classified according to the 6th and 7th edition of the TNM classification of the UICC.

Associations between categorical variables at surgery were assessed by Fisher exact test.
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the occurrence probability of an event (death,
recurrence). Point and interval estimates for survival probabilities at 60 months were
calculated. Differences between patient groups with respect to their survival were assessed
using log-rank tests, and the difference was considered to be statistically significant at
P<0.05. Apart from patient's sex and age at surgery, those covariates with a P value < 0.05
in univariate survival analysis (log rank test) were entered into multivariate Cox
proportional-hazards analysis to assess the independent influence of these covariates. In
this case, significance statements refer to P values of 2-tailed tests with a P-value ‚ȧ0.05.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with esophageal cancer

- > 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

- none

Type of Study:


Study Design:

Observational Model: Case-Only, Time Perspective: Retrospective

Outcome Measure:

Overall survival

Outcome Time Frame:

5 years

Safety Issue:


Principal Investigator

Jakob R Izbicki, MD.

Investigator Role:

Study Chair

Investigator Affiliation:

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf


Germany: Ethics Commission

Study ID:




Start Date:

April 2008

Completion Date:

May 2011

Related Keywords:

  • Esophageal Cancer
  • esophagus
  • Esophageal Diseases
  • Esophageal Neoplasms