Know Cancer

or
forgot password

Objective and Subjective Outcomes of an Electronic Chest Drainage System Versus Traditional Devices: a Randomized Comparison


N/A
18 Years
90 Years
Not Enrolling
Both
Lung Cancer

Thank you

Trial Information

Objective and Subjective Outcomes of an Electronic Chest Drainage System Versus Traditional Devices: a Randomized Comparison


Inclusion Criteria:



1. Able and willing to read, understand, and provide written Informed Consent

2. Age range of 18-90 years

3. Patients undergoing a segmentectomy, lobectomy, or bilobectomy. Both open and
minimally invasive (thoracoscopic or robotic) resections are acceptable.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients unstable enough to require ICU care upon completion of the resection

2. Redo thoracotomies

Type of Study:

Interventional

Study Design:

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Supportive Care

Outcome Measure:

Duration of chest tubes

Outcome Time Frame:

date of chest tube removal

Safety Issue:

No

Principal Investigator

Cecilia Pompili, MD

Investigator Role:

Principal Investigator

Investigator Affiliation:

Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy

Authority:

United States: Institutional Review Board

Study ID:

PATSAT-2012-1

NCT ID:

NCT01747889

Start Date:

January 2013

Completion Date:

May 2013

Related Keywords:

  • Lung Cancer
  • chest tube
  • lung resection
  • patient satisfaction
  • mobility
  • Lung Neoplasms

Name

Location