Trial Information

Phase 2 Study of AR-67 (DB-67) in Myelodysplastic Syndrome(MDS)

The management of MDS has been, until recently, based mostly on supportive care. This
includes transfusion support, hematopoietic growth factors, and management of complications.
With this management, the disease would run its natural course and the patient eventually
died either from progression to acute leukemia or from complications associated with MDS
itself (e.g., infections, hemorrhage). Recently, hypomethylating agents have offered promise
for the management of patients with MDS. Although both agents have shown efficacy in a
subset of patients, responses are usually either partial or hematologic improvement only,
with CR rates <10%. In addition, responses have a median duration of less than 12 months.
Thus, although both of these agents have improved the outcome of patients with MDS and been
approved by the FDA for this purpose, there is clearly need for additional and more
effective agents for this disease.

In vitro data suggested that topoisomerase I inhibitors could have activity in MDS, and a
prolonged exposure appeared to be particularly effective. Topotecan was the first agent of
this class explored for this purpose. A phase I study established the maximum tolerated dose
(MTD) at 2 mg/m2/day as a continuous infusion for 5 days. Using this dose, a phase II study
in patients with MDS and CMML, a complete remission rate of 31% was achieved. These agents
are now considered the most effective available to date in the treatment of MDS and
constitute standard therapy. Because of the different times when the studies were conducted
and the different eligibility criteria used (e.g., patients with secondary MDS not eligible
for decitabine, only patients with high-risk MDS eligible for topotecan), comparisons are
somehow limited. However, results with topotecan compare favorably to those obtained with
both 5-azacytidine and decitabine. The CR rate is the highest achieved with any of these
agents. Response duration is shorter than that reported for AZA, but the remission duration
for AZA includes hematologic improvements which constitute most of the responses with AZA.
In addition, the AZA study continued therapy until the response was lost, while the
topotecan study (as well as the decitabine study) administered by design only 4-6 cycles of
therapy. Survival was shorter for patients treated with topotecan, but this is not
unexpected considering that this population included 50% of patients with CMML and 32% with
secondary MDS, both important adverse prognostic characteristics in MDS. The AZA study had
the best survival, but it included 37% patients with RA or RAES and only 20% with
intermediate-2 or high IPSS. Because the eligibility included patients with greater than
10% blasts, all MDS patients would have had a score of at least 1.5 and thus be classified
in the intermediate-2 risk group.

Based on the favorable activity of topotecan as a single agent, topotecan was also used in
combination with cytarabine in high-risk MDS (i.e., RAEB with >10% blasts or RAEBt). A CR
rate of 56% was achieved, with a low rate of induction mortality (7%) in a population with a
median age of 68 years. These results were at least equivalent to those achieved with an
idarubicin and cytarabine combination both in a retrospective comparison of two different
trials, and in a prospective randomized trial.

Overall, these results suggest that additional exploration of topoisomerase I inhibitors in
myelodysplastic syndrome is warranted.