Know Cancer

or
forgot password

Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Value of PETSCAn in ColoRectal Cancer (CRC)


N/A
18 Years
N/A
Not Enrolling
Both
Colorectal Cancer Metastatic, Early Response Evaluation, Fdg-PET

Thank you

Trial Information

Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Value of PETSCAn in ColoRectal Cancer (CRC)


statistical hypothesis : Sample size calculation for FDG-PET in metastatic patients.

In the paper of Cascini et al. [1], they have 18 patients with a TRG response (TRG = Tumor
Regression Grade) and 15 patients with no response.

SUV mean was measured at baseline and at day 12 in all 33 patients. All 33 patients showed a
reduction in SUV-mean from baseline to day 12. The median reduction in SUV-mean was 63%
(mean 66%) in responding tumors and 22% (mean 22%) for non responding tumors. Using a cutoff
level of 52% a perfect accuracy could be obtained, i.e. all responding tumors had a SUV-mean
reduction higher than 52% and all non responding tumors had a SUV-mean reduction lower than
52%.

(Standard deviation of the SUV-mean reduction was 25.) All 33 patients showed also a
reduction in SUV-max from baseline to day 12. The median reduction in SUV-max was 62% in
responding tumors and 28% in non responding tumors. (No information about mean or standard
deviation of SUV-max available in [1].) Based on the data of SUV-mean we can do a power
calculation based on the Wilcoxon test: In order to demonstrate an absolute difference in
the mean of ΔSUV-mean of 44% between responding and non responding patients, with an
estimated standard deviation of 25, using 35 patients (50% response, 50% no response), at a
significance level of 5%, we obtain a power of 0.98.

For SUV-max, if we assume that the difference in the means is similar to the difference in
the medians, i.e. 34% and the standard deviation is similar to the one of SUV-mean, i.e. 25,
we obtain a power of 0.93 If we, to be safe, are a little bit less optimistic and estimate
that the difference in the mean of ΔSUV-max between responding and non responding tumors
would be a little lower than in [1]: 35%, and the standard deviation a little bit higher:
30, then we need 40 patients at a power of 0.90

Référence 1 : Cascini GL, Avallone A, Delrio P, Guida C, Tatangelo F, Marone P et al.:
F-18-FDG PET is an early predictor of pathologic tumor response to preoperative
radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2006, 47:
1241-1248.


Inclusion Criteria:



- advanced colorectal cancer

- evaluable disease

- signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- no other cancer

- no other life-threatening condition

- unwillingness or inability to sign informed consent

- active cerebral metastasis

Type of Study:

Observational

Study Design:

Time Perspective: Prospective

Outcome Measure:

compare fdg-pet variations after 1 course of chemotherapy to chemotherapy outcome measured by time to disease progression

Outcome Time Frame:

Time to Disease progression

Safety Issue:

No

Principal Investigator

Alain - Hendlisz, MD

Investigator Role:

Principal Investigator

Investigator Affiliation:

Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels

Authority:

Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicinal Products and Health Products

Study ID:

earlyPETmCRC

NCT ID:

NCT00741481

Start Date:

June 2006

Completion Date:

July 2010

Related Keywords:

  • Colorectal Cancer Metastatic
  • Early Response Evaluation
  • Fdg-PET
  • metastatic colorectal cancer
  • fdg pet
  • response evaluation
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Neoplasms
  • Neoplasms, Second Primary

Name

Location