Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Value of PETSCAn in ColoRectal Cancer (CRC)
statistical hypothesis : Sample size calculation for FDG-PET in metastatic patients.
In the paper of Cascini et al. [1], they have 18 patients with a TRG response (TRG = Tumor
Regression Grade) and 15 patients with no response.
SUV mean was measured at baseline and at day 12 in all 33 patients. All 33 patients showed a
reduction in SUV-mean from baseline to day 12. The median reduction in SUV-mean was 63%
(mean 66%) in responding tumors and 22% (mean 22%) for non responding tumors. Using a cutoff
level of 52% a perfect accuracy could be obtained, i.e. all responding tumors had a SUV-mean
reduction higher than 52% and all non responding tumors had a SUV-mean reduction lower than
52%.
(Standard deviation of the SUV-mean reduction was 25.) All 33 patients showed also a
reduction in SUV-max from baseline to day 12. The median reduction in SUV-max was 62% in
responding tumors and 28% in non responding tumors. (No information about mean or standard
deviation of SUV-max available in [1].) Based on the data of SUV-mean we can do a power
calculation based on the Wilcoxon test: In order to demonstrate an absolute difference in
the mean of ΔSUV-mean of 44% between responding and non responding patients, with an
estimated standard deviation of 25, using 35 patients (50% response, 50% no response), at a
significance level of 5%, we obtain a power of 0.98.
For SUV-max, if we assume that the difference in the means is similar to the difference in
the medians, i.e. 34% and the standard deviation is similar to the one of SUV-mean, i.e. 25,
we obtain a power of 0.93 If we, to be safe, are a little bit less optimistic and estimate
that the difference in the mean of ΔSUV-max between responding and non responding tumors
would be a little lower than in [1]: 35%, and the standard deviation a little bit higher:
30, then we need 40 patients at a power of 0.90
Référence 1 : Cascini GL, Avallone A, Delrio P, Guida C, Tatangelo F, Marone P et al.:
F-18-FDG PET is an early predictor of pathologic tumor response to preoperative
radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2006, 47:
1241-1248.
Observational
Time Perspective: Prospective
compare fdg-pet variations after 1 course of chemotherapy to chemotherapy outcome measured by time to disease progression
Time to Disease progression
No
Alain - Hendlisz, MD
Principal Investigator
Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels
Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicinal Products and Health Products
earlyPETmCRC
NCT00741481
June 2006
July 2010
Name | Location |
---|