Unilateral Versus Bilateral Stents for Bismuth Type II and III Malignant Hilar Strictures: A Prospective, Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
Cholangiocarcinoma accounts for 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers and is the second
commonest primary liver cancer. However only a few patients are suitable for surgical
resection and therefore endoscopic biliary drainage is the most used palliative treatment
modality for malignant hilar stricture. However, whether one or two stents can benefit the
patients most is still to be defined. Numerous retrospective case series reached different
conclusion, till now, only one randomized trial compared the effect of unilateral versus
bilateral stenting in patients with malignant hilar obstruction, nonetheless, nearly one
third of the patients had Bismuth Type I stricture, and one stent is enough for drainage in
this situation, therefore, the best drainage strategy for patients with Bismuth Type II or
Bismuth Type III malignant hilar obstruction is unknown. The aim of the present study was to
compare the effect of unilateral versus bilateral stenting in patients with Bismuth Type II
or III malignant hilar obstruction.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Early complications
30 days within treatment
No
Zhaoshen Li, MD
Principal Investigator
Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University
China: Food and Drug Administration
Changhai-080129
NCT00653978
May 2008
December 2011
Name | Location |
---|