Investigating Bone Density and Bone Loss Without Baseline Information
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the effects on bone mineral density (BMD) in the L2-L4 (posterio-anterior)
region of the spine and hip by assessing bone density in postmenopausal women with
breast cancer receiving treatment on protocol IBCSG-1-98.
- Compare the incidence of radiological gross changes and fractures identified from spine
x-rays (T4-L4) in these patients (in groups 1 and 2).
- Use longitudinal BMD measurements to estimate a linear rate of bone loss based on mixed
effect models.
- Identify serum markers for bone loss to determine how they correlate with osteoporosis,
microfractures, clinical fractures, and breast cancer-related bone events.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study and a substudy of protocol IBCSG-1-98. Patients are
assigned to 1 of 3 groups according to the length of treatment they have undergone on
protocol IBCSG-1-98.
- Group 1 (prior to or at the end of the second year of treatment on protocol
IBCSG-1-98): Patients undergo bone mineral density (BMD) testing of the L2-L4 spine and
hip at baseline and years 1, 2, 3, and 4 from baseline. They also undergo x-rays of the
T4-L4 spine at baseline and years 1, 3, and 4 from baseline.
- Group 2 (after 2 years but before the end of the third year of treatment on protocol
IBCSG-1-98): Patients undergo BMD testing of the L2-L4 spine and hip at baseline and
years 1, 2, and 3 from baseline. They also undergo x-rays of the T4-L4 spine at
baseline and years 2 and 3 from baseline.
- Group 3 (after 3 years but before the end of the fifth year of treatment on protocol
IBCSG-1-98): Patients undergo BMD testing of the L2-L4 spine and hip at baseline and
years 1 and 2 from baseline (for patients in 4th year of treatment) or year 1 from
baseline (for patients in 5th year of treatment).
Patients undergo blood collection at baseline and periodically during study for biomarker
correlative study.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 660 patients will be accrued for this study.
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Relative percent change of bone mineral density (BMD) form baseline to after 2, 3, 4, or 5 years of treatment on protocol IBCSG-1-98
5 years after randomisation to BIG 1-98
No
Stefan Aebi, MD
Study Chair
University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
United States: Federal Government
CDR0000482381
NCT00369850
May 2004
January 2012
Name | Location |
---|