Know Cancer

or
forgot password

EPREX (Epoetin Alfa) Versus ARANESP (Darbepoetin Alfa): Looking at Outcome of Anemia Treatment and Comparing Cost-effectiveness (EVALUATE).


Phase 4
18 Years
N/A
Not Enrolling
Both
Anemia, Neoplasms

Thank you

Trial Information

EPREX (Epoetin Alfa) Versus ARANESP (Darbepoetin Alfa): Looking at Outcome of Anemia Treatment and Comparing Cost-effectiveness (EVALUATE).


Anemia has been identified as a common complication and a widespread problem in the cancer
population. Anemia is a condition in which a patient has below normal levels of
hemoglobin, the substance in red blood cells that carries oxygen to all parts of the body.
People with severe anemia may experience fatigue and shortness of breath with activity.
Therefore, this condition can have a negative influence on a person's quality of life.
Epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa, used to treat anemia in cancer patients, are genetically
engineered proteins that stimulate red blood cell production. This study investigates
treatment of anemia using either epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa during chemotherapy in
adult patients with cancer. The study is intended to collect information on normal medical
practice and routine anemia management performed at the participating centers. This is an
observational, non-randomized, prospective, comparative, parallel-group survey performed in
The Netherlands. Patients with various severities of disease may enter the survey as soon as
either their epoetin alfa or their darbepoetin alfa treatment starts and will be followed
until the end of their epoetin alfa/darbepoetin alfa treatment. Patient data are collected,
on average, once monthly (depending on the treatment being received) and this continues
until 4 weeks after the end of treatment with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa. An
assessment of cost-effectiveness will be made for both treatments. The assessment of
cost-effectiveness will be based on the following: cancer type and status, chemotherapy and
other anti-cancer treatment, hemoglobin levels, use of either epoetin alfa or darbepoetin
alfa, use of blood transfusions, and serum iron levels and iron supplementation. Safety
evaluations include the incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events. Because the
study involves only collection of information, no treatment will be required by the Sponsor
and no medication will be supplied by the Sponsor. Epoetin alpha and darbepoetin alpha are
administered according to routine clinical practice.


Inclusion Criteria:



- Patients with a diagnosis of solid tumors, multiple myeloma (Kahlers' disease),
non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Hodgkins' disease

- Patients must already be receiving chemotherapy or start their first cycle within a
week of enrollment

- Patients must receive either epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa treatment (expected
treatment duration is at least 4 weeks)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients not meeting all of the inclusion criteria for entry into the study

- Patients who cannot read the Dutch language and/or do not understand the Dutch
Informed Consent Form

Type of Study:

Observational

Study Design:

Time Perspective: Prospective

Outcome Measure:

Cost-effectiveness based on: cancer type and status, chemotherapy and other anti-cancer treatment, hemoglobin levels, use of either epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa, use of blood transfusions, serum iron levels and iron supplementation.

Outcome Time Frame:

4 weeks, 8 weeks and end of treatment

Safety Issue:

No

Principal Investigator

Janssen-Cilag B.V. Clinical Trial

Investigator Role:

Study Director

Investigator Affiliation:

Janssen-Cilag B.V.

Authority:

Netherlands: Netherlands Medicines Evaluation Board

Study ID:

CR002455

NCT ID:

NCT00264108

Start Date:

June 2005

Completion Date:

February 2011

Related Keywords:

  • Anemia
  • Neoplasms
  • Antineoplastic agents
  • Chemotherapy
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Epoetin alfa
  • Darbepoetin alfa
  • Anemia
  • Neoplasms

Name

Location