Comparison of Two Therapies for UES Dysphagia
Secondary aims of this research are:
1. Determine in a descriptive manner whether patients with residue in the pyriform sinuses
who aspirate the residue after the swallow respond better, i.e., a higher percentage of
them can return to 100% oral intake, than patients with residue in the valleculae who
aspirate after the swallow or patients with residue in both locations who aspirate
after the swallow and thus to define the spectrum of indications for the proposed
exercise programs in the two groups of dysphagic patients (stroke and post-chemo
radiation treatment for head and neck cancer) and whether postures enable each patient
type to swallow more bolus types without aspiration at pre- and post
2. Define the pathophysiology underlying the swallow dysfunction and those
pathophysiologic elements which change as a result of each therapy program including
changes in -
1. anteroposterior and lateral diameter of maximum deglutitive UES opening
2. maximum deglutitive laryngeal anterior and superior excursions
Interventional
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Reza Shaker, M.D.
Principal Investigator
Professor and Chief, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Director, Digestive Disease Center, Medical College of Wisconsin
United States: Federal Government
UESD (completed)
NCT00059670
December 2007
Name | Location |
---|---|
Medical College University of Wisconsin | Milwaukee, Wisconsin |